Listen free for 30 days

Listen with offer

Preview

£0.00 for first 30 days

Pick 1 audiobook a month from our unmatched collection - including bestsellers and new releases.
Listen all you want to thousands of included audiobooks, Originals, celeb exclusives, and podcasts.
Access exclusive sales and deals.
£7.99/month after 30 days. Renews automatically. See here for eligibility.

The Rivals of Sherlock Holmes

By: Graeme Davis - editor
Narrated by: Paul Boehmer, Maxwell Caulfield, Gabrielle de Cuir, Alex Hyde-White, John Lee, Jim Meskimen, Stefan Rudnicki, full cast
Try for £0.00

£7.99/month after 30 days. Renews automatically. See here for eligibility.

Buy Now for £17.99

Buy Now for £17.99

Pay using card ending in
By completing your purchase, you agree to Audible's Conditions of Use and authorise Audible to charge your designated card or any other card on file. Please see our Privacy Notice, Cookies Notice and Interest-based Ads Notice.

Summary

This masterful collection of 17 classic mystery stories, dating from 1837 to 1914, traces the earliest history of popular detective fiction.

Today, the figure of Sherlock Holmes towers over detective fiction like a colossus - but it was not always so. Edgar Allan Poe’s French detective Dupin, the hero of “The Murders in the Rue Morgue”, preceded Holmes’s deductive reasoning by more than 40 years with his “tales of ratiocination.” In A Study in Scarlet, the first of Holmes’ adventures, Doyle acknowledged his debt to Poe - and to Émile Gaboriau, whose thief-turned-detective Monsieur Lecoq debuted in France 20 years earlier.

If “Rue Morgue” was the first true detective story in English, the title of the first full-length detective novel is more hotly contested. Two books by Wilkie Collins - The Woman in White (1859) and The Moonstone (1868) - are often given that honor, with the latter showing many of the features that came to identify the genre: a locked-room murder in an English country house; bungling local detectives outmatched by a brilliant amateur detective; a large cast of suspects and a plethora of red herrings; and a final twist before the truth is revealed. Others point to Mary Elizabeth Braddon’s The Trail of the Serpent (1861) or Aurora Floyd (1862), and others still to The Notting Hill Mystery (1862-3) by the pseudonymous “Charles Felix.”

As the early years of detective fiction gave way to two separate golden ages - of hard-boiled tales in America and intricately-plotted, so-called “cozy” murders in Britain - the legacy of Sherlock Holmes, with his fierce devotion to science and logic, gave way to street smarts on the one hand and social insight on the other - but even though these new sub-genres went their own ways, their detectives still required the intelligence and clear-sightedness that characterized the earliest works of detective fiction: the trademarks of Sherlock Holmes, and of all the detectives featured here.

©2019 Compilation by Graeme Davis. Introduction © 2019 by Graeme Davis. "The Origins of Sherlock Holmes": © 2019 by Leslie S. Klinger (P)2019 Blackstone Publishing
activate_Holiday_promo_in_buybox_DT_T2

Listeners also enjoyed...

The Rivals: Tales of Sherlock Holmes’ Rival Detectives cover art
Sherlock Holmes: The Carleton Hobbs Collection cover art
Dr Gideon Fell: The Complete BBC Radio Drama Collection cover art
The D'Arblay Mystery cover art
A Silent Witness cover art
The Sherlock Holmes Collection II cover art
The Adventure of the Blue Carbuncle cover art
Thorndyke: Novels 1-4 cover art
The Mystery of Angelina Frood cover art
The Lock and Key Library: Classic Mystery and Detective Stories: Modern English cover art
In Re: Sherlock Holmes cover art
At the Earth's Core cover art
The Merry Wives of Windsor cover art
What Maisie Knew cover art
Sherlock Holmes: The Memoirs of Sherlock Holmes cover art
The Four Just Men cover art

What listeners say about The Rivals of Sherlock Holmes

Average customer ratings
Overall
  • 3 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    1
  • 4 Stars
    1
  • 3 Stars
    1
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    1
Performance
  • 3 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    0
  • 4 Stars
    2
  • 3 Stars
    1
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    1
Story
  • 3 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    0
  • 4 Stars
    2
  • 3 Stars
    1
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    1

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.

Sort by:
Filter by:
  • Overall
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    3 out of 5 stars

A curate's egg.

A bishop asked a curate if he was enjoying his egg. Supposedly, he replied, "Parts of it are excellent, my lord."
If you did not need me to explain that joke, then this is the book for you. It is a book for those of you who like books written by people who were there. It begins with a long rambling essay about Victorian crime fiction that the people who will enjoy this book do not need. We know that. Get on with it.
The first story is set in Enfield. I lived in Enfield for more than forty years. It is about an heiress who was held prisoner in a private insane asylum in Enfield Chase. If you wanted to hide a same woman in a lunatic asylum, Enfield Chase was a good place to choose. He says it became a workhouse for the surrounding parishes and there was a workhouse in Enfield Chase that took children from the surrounding parishes.
It seems to have been a much nicer place than the one in Oliver Twist. His contemporaries criticised Dickens for laying on the misery with a trowel but modern writers think that is how it was in all workhouse at all times. They slavishly copy the few Victorian writers they have heard of.
I would have given it four stars if it had not included extracts from longer works. I might have given it five of some of the pronunciations seemed odd. I don't think Victorian Englishmen and women pronounced that word like that.
Some stories are great. Lady Molly is a believably arrogant but charming feminist in a man's world. The Doctor Thorndike story is another highlight. Some not so good. The ones set in France are like bad episodes of 'Allo 'Allo. Some have too many words, a common fault of Victorian writers.
One writer said there were were one or two men. That was a phrase often used by Victorian writers and it has annoyed me for more than forty years.
Were there one or two men?
If there were lots of men there, you might say there were ten or twenty men there. You would say there were one or two hundred but I think most of us can tell the difference between one man and two.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!