Listen free for 30 days
Listen with offer
-
The Enneads Volume 1 (1-3)
- Narrated by: Peter Wickham
- Length: 14 hrs and 19 mins
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to wishlist failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
£0.00 for first 30 days
Buy Now for £26.99
No valid payment method on file.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
Summary
Plotinus (204/5 -270 CE), born in Lycopolis, Egypt, when it was part of the Roman Empire, was a major figure in the philosophical school later called Neoplatonism. Neoplatonists viewed reality as deriving from a single force or figure expressed as 'the One'. Two further concepts from Plotinus, 'the Intellect' and 'the Soul', are also principal features of his philosophy. These proposals led to the work of Plotinus forming a bridge between Plato and the monotheistic religions of Christianity, Judaism, and Islam as well as Gnosticism.
Yet Plotinus, who spoke Greek, did not actually leave a written legacy of his ideas. His work was written down and compiled by a pupil, Porphyry of Tyre (c234-c305 CE). Porphyry presented Plotinus' work in six 'Enneads', each containing nine 'Tractates' - (ennea = 'nine' in Greek), amounting to 54 treatises in all. They were originally arranged into three volumes, but in this Ukemi recording they are divided into two equal parts. The first three Enneads contained in this recording are prefaced by the fascinating biography written by Porphyry, who describes Plotinus as a highly singular figure - he declined to sit for a painter or sculptor, he wouldn't eat meat from animals reared for the table, and he 'caught philosophy at the age of 20'.
The First Tractate of the First Ennead opens with 'The Animate and the Man'; subjects of other tractates include 'On Virtue', 'On True Happiness', and 'On the Primal Good and Secondary Forms of Good'. The Second Ennead opens with 'On the Cosmos or the Heavenly System' and continues with 'The Heavenly Circuit' and 'Are the Stars Causes?' The Third Ennead opens with 'Fate' and continues with two essays: 'On Providence' and then 'Our Tutelary Spirit'. Peter Wickham, in this first audiobook recording of the Enneads, presents Plotinus in a clear and steady manner.
What listeners say about The Enneads Volume 1 (1-3)
Average customer ratingsReviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- Amazon Kunde
- 12-07-21
very interesting
very interesting philosophy. The ready makes it very good to listen to. thank you
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- Mr. Nadim Bakhshov
- 23-06-21
extremely well read, the classic of Neoplatonism
Plotinus is perhaps the most important figure in the history of neoplatonism, the translation by Stephen McKenna is good and although it is now being challenged by Lloyd Gerson it is an extremely good listen and works well on audiobook
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- Morgoth
- 14-08-18
Complex, difficult, perplexing, and wonderful
This This book is probably best read (with a dictionary to hand) than heard, due to its use of complex sentences constructed almost entirely of ‘big-words’ with multi layered meanings, throughout. Furthermore, the complexity of the enneads increases incrementally, so the works only get more difficult to comprehend. As such, these works will need multiple listens to grasp even a portion of the concepts being discussed, but even so, you gain insights along the way.
The level of difficulty and complexity involved in the concepts, and the use of complicated sentence construction highlights how much more intelligent Plotinus was then, than the majority are today. I’ve read quite a few classics and this one doesn’t disappoint, just know that it’s not easy. However, I’m a believer that sometimes you have to go further back in time to read up on topics like those discussed here, than more modern versions, as the modern works are mostly dumbed down, whereas the classics are pure. Sure, time and science will altar some aspects of discussion, but not all, and all can be taken into account.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!
3 people found this helpful